We aspire to select research paper, through highest quality peer review. To accomplish this, the entire peer review and publication process must be thorough, objective, and honest. Virtually every facet of this process involves important ethical rules and conclusions, which are seldom explicitly stated and still less often shared with the readership. Journals' reputations depend on the trust of readers, writers, researchers, commentators, editors, research studies, support agencies, and administrators of public health insurance. This confidence is enhanced by describing as explicitly as possible the journal's policies to assure the ethical discussion of all participants in the publishing process.
Editorial Decisions should be precise.Decisions about a manuscript should be based only on its originality, importance,clarity and relevance of research work.If a published paper is subsequently found to have errors or major flaws, the Editor should take responsibility for promptly correcting the written record in the publication.Ratings of review quality and other performance characteristics of editors should be periodically assessed to assure optimal publication performance, and must contribute to decisions on reappointment. Individual performance data must be confidential.
IJRDT provides immediate open access to its content, along the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. IJRDT is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her establishment. Users are permitted to register, download, copy, broadcast, print, search, or link to the full texts of the clauses in this journal without requiring prior permission from the publisher, providing that they with acknowledge its initial publishing in this diary.